Pay by phone: More merchants embrace direct mobile billing

0

Charge it to my phone. It’s the shopper’s new mantra as wireless carriers increasingly let users tack on charges – racked up at other online stores – to their phone bills. BilltoMobile, Boku and
Zong (owned by PayPal)
are luring online
businesses to try their mobile payment software as an option for customers
who don’t have a credit
card or can’t be bothered
with punching their credit card digits on a Web page or an app. Hundreds of businesses,
including Facebook,
Zynga and dating website
Lavalife, are among
merchants that now accept
direct-phone-billing payment. And that’s
despite the high
commission rates – 10
percent to 20 percent of
the transaction – that the
billing companies charge merchants. (Much of that
goes to wireless carriers.) Direct-phone-billing is
much more prevalent in
Asia, Europe and the
Middle East, where
wireless carriers have
more sophisticated billing systems. The companies’ payment
systems are similar. You
get an option to pay with
your phone at the buy-now
page, where you type in
your phone number. Users of BilltoMobile and Zong
must punch in a secret
code that’s texted to the
phone immediately.
Charges show up on the
phone bill. “There no need to type any credit card numbers,” said Jim Greenwell, CEO of
BilltoMobile, a Korean
company whose system is
accepted by about 300
merchants in the U.S. You can’t buy a couch on
Target.com, however. U.S. wireless carriers only allow online purchases of
songs, videos and data
products, such as
Facebook credits and
imaginary plants for
“FarmVille,” an online game. The purchases are
limited to about $100 a
month because the
carriers don’t want
customers facing bill
shock, said David Yoo of Boku. To grow domestically, the
companies will have to
convince skittish
consumers who’ve been
victimized by fraudulent
and unitemized billing in the past from fly-by-
nighters that sold
ringtones and wallpapers,
said Chetan Sharma, a
mobile analyst. “The
industry has learned from the experience, and
there’s more vetting of the
merchants,” he said. Zong audits merchants by
verifying executives and
addresses, as well as
visiting the site, said Hill
Ferguson, PayPal’s head
of mobile. Security concern from
users who lose their
phones is also a lingering
issue. If a phone is reported lost to the
carrier, the payment
function is cut off
immediately, Greenwell
said. “We see very little
fraud.” Merchants, carriers and the companies will also
have to convince
customers that charges
will be itemized clearly
and that refunds will be
handled properly and quickly, said Steve Mott,
an industry analyst at
BetterBuyDesign. “They
have to accept some sort
of liability. Whether that’s
as good as credit cards remains to be seen,” he
said.

Source: physorg.com

TWITTER Takes Spammers To Court

0

SAN FRANCISCO:
Twitter filed a lawsuit on
Thursday in a US court
against five websites that
it accuses of creating tools
for spamming, as the social media firm battles a
wave of automated tweets
barraging real users with
anything from Viagra ads
to virus-ridden links. Often billed as a service to
help a Twitter account
gain followers, websites
can take control of an
account, known as a bot,
that follows or sends automated tweets at real
users in the hope that some
will follow the bot back or
click through links the bot
has sent out. “As our engineers continue
to combat spammers with
strong safeguards and
technical efforts, today
we’re adding another
weapon to our arsenal: the law,” Twitter said in a blog
post. Twitter now claims 140
million active users. As its
user base has grown, so
have bots and spam,
emerging as a problem
that Twitter fears could dilute the online
conversation and irk bona
fide users. Litigation isn’t a novel
approach: both Facebook
and Google have taken
spammers to court in
recent years with success. The defendants listed in
the suit filed in the US
Federal Court in San
Franciso are
TweetAttacks,
TweetAdder, TweetBuddy, James
Lucero of justinlover.info
and Garland E Harris of
troption.com. The defendants could not
immediately be reached
for comment by Reuters. “We’ve focused on tool
providers; They have
willfully created tools that
enable others to propagate
spam on Twitter,” Twitter
said. “With this suit, we’re going
straight to the source. By
shutting down tool
providers, we will prevent
other spammers from
having these services at their disposal. Further, we
hope the suit acts as a
deterrent to other
spammers, demonstrating
the strength of our
commitment to keep them off Twitter.” In its blog post, Twitter
noted its recent acquisition
of Dasient, a web security
company that Twitter says
represents a part of its
“larger investment in security and fraud
protection.”

source: Times Of India